01internal path
Software delivery
Review a proposed fix with test evidence and a release request. Selected internal delivery paths provide a starting point; a pilot still needs checks for your repository and deployment.
for owners and teams using ai
Work moves.
You decide.
Still chasing updates across chats, tasks and AI tools? KOD.AI is building Gorgos to bring work, evidence and approval requests together, so you can see what needs attention and decide the next step.
Internal alpha · evaluating one workflow at a time.
delegate & report
example signal
human checkpoint
00 / daily work
Less chasing.
A clearer next step.
When every handoff comes back to you, adding another AI tool can mean more coordination. The goal is to turn one recurring workflow into a reviewed result, with a clear owner and a visible next step.
Work ready for review
Define the finished output: a proposed software fix, a sourced report or a draft response. Review the result against that brief.
Decisions in context
Bring the request, supporting evidence and unresolved questions together, so you know what you are being asked to approve.
Progress you can check
Agree what counts as success, then compare the result with the starting point: review time, accepted outputs and cost per completed task.
01 / operating model
the system behind the work
One place for work, review and approval.
Gorgos is the company runtime KOD.AI is developing for this model. The internal alpha connects selected workflows to context, policy and an owner cockpit. A pilot defines which parts apply to your process.
- 01Human owner
Chooses the scope, acceptable result and approval rules. Sensitive moves follow the agreed authority boundary.
- 02AI CEO — the coordination model
Uses company context to propose and route work. Continuous operation across a whole company remains the longer-term ambition.
- 03Departments & teams
Group work by responsibility, so a request has a named owner, an expected output and a review path.
- 04Worker & reviewer agents
Separate producing a draft from checking it. Agree the quality checks and where unresolved work returns to a person.
- 05Work and decision records
Link inputs, instructions and outcomes for covered workflows. Access and retained records depend on the deployment.
- 06Reasoning graphs
Define how a workflow uses agents and tools, checks their results and asks for a decision at the agreed points.
02 / decision flow
From a software issue to a reviewed change.
Illustrative delivery workflow. A pilot defines the repository, checks, permissions and release procedure. A successful run includes the deployed result and its verification.
- →Capture the issue
Record what went wrong, the expected behaviour and the starting state.
- →Define the result
Agree the scope, who accepts the work and what remains outside it.
- →Prepare a change
Work in the approved workspace and add checks for the reported behaviour.
- →Review the evidence
Inspect the change, test results and remaining risks before deciding on release.
- →Approve the release
The named approver decides whether the result meets the agreed release criteria.
- ✓Check the result
Verify the deployed behaviour and record the outcome. Agree recovery before release.
03 / use cases
Start with a recurring piece of work.
02pilot idea
Research & drafts
A sourced prospect brief or content draft for review. Publishing, contacting people and access to customer systems need a separately agreed execution path.
03pilot idea
Reports & follow-ups
A summary of approved records with sources, unresolved questions and proposed next actions. The pilot establishes which inputs are available and how stale or missing data appears.
04scope first
Your recurring handoff
Choose a task that keeps returning to you. Define its inputs, finished output and approver, then measure whether the workflow reduces coordination without adding more review work.
04 / your control
human in command
Choose what can act.
See what happened.
Approval where you need it
Covered actions follow configured policy: run automatically, wait for owner approval or remain forbidden. Your pilot defines the actions and permissions.
A reviewable result
Inspect the request, evidence and decision record on supported paths. The pilot verifies what gets recorded and which failures remain visible.
A defined release boundary
Agree required checks and who can authorize a release. Recovery depends on the system and the change, so it belongs in the plan.
A route back to control
The internal alpha includes pause controls for covered automation. Verify the pause and recovery behaviour for your workflow before relying on it.
05 / status
An internal alpha.
A bigger ambition.
Existing implementation includes an owner cockpit, policy classification, selected decision records and analytical views. KOD.AI is developing Gorgos toward company operations that run within owner-set authority. A client pilot validates a named workflow, its data, permissions and acceptance criteria.
internalowner cockpit implementation
coveredpolicy and decision paths
scopedworkflow-specific setup
nextexternal workflow validation
company.kodai.com.pl
Which handoff keeps
coming back to you?
Send one recurring process: where inputs arrive, what a finished result looks like and who must approve it. We’ll discuss whether Gorgos fits, then agree pilot scope, needed access, operating costs and how success will be measured.